3 ms·
It's not clear from their vague, weasely language whether they're accusing him of any involvement beyond building the privacy tool. If they had any evidence of
by dlubarov 4y ago
It's not clear from their vague, weasely language whether they're accusing him of any involvement beyond building the privacy tool. If they had any evidence of that, presumably they would have said so.
> suspected of involvement in concealing criminal financial flows and facilitating money laundering
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- kube-system 4y agoPress releases are usually summaries, not all encompassing dumps of evidence.
- dlubarov 4y agoOf course; what I'm suggesting is that they would have simply used less ambiguous language like "working with" or "providing support to". Their weasely language suggests that they need plausible deniability because their insinuations may turn out to be baseless.