3 ms·
I disagree with your maximalism definition, it usually refers to the opinion that all other crypto is worthless garbage and [BTC/ETH/___] is the only one that w
by tyrfing 4y ago
I disagree with your maximalism definition, it usually refers to the opinion that all other crypto is worthless garbage and [BTC/ETH/___] is the only one that will survive. It's possible to have those extreme pro-crypto opinions without being a maximalist.
- rvz 4y ago> I disagree with your maximalism definition, it usually refers to the opinion that all other crypto is worthless garbage and [BTC/ETH/___] is the only one that will survive. Right. However, the difference is that I'm observing it all with the facts involved and balanced perspective that goes behind the headlines. So far, the whole thing looks like a similar process of the dotcom boom and bust cycle. My general point is that not all of these 20,000+ cryptocurrencies or crypto projects will all survive the test of regulations to come. Just like not all the 10,000+ dotcom companies that rode the hype train decades ago survived either after the speculation, hype and mania. Only a few crypto projects / companies that have survived these crash(es) and have some compliance with regulations, were the ones that are to be used by many companies. It's a logical and a very realistic outcome, which is not even close to being a 'maximalism definition'. I'm not the one promoting a single true coin to takeover the current financial system or 'pricing everything in sats' or suggesting that 'blockchain + NFTs will replace and be used everywhere from medicine, law, real estate and in space'.