4 ms·
I still don't know a better language for parallelism. Some alternatives can make up for being sluggish by employing parallelism. Haskell is already reasonably e
by Syzygies 4y ago
I still don't know a better language for parallelism. Some alternatives can make up for being sluggish by employing parallelism. Haskell is already reasonably efficient (for my problems) and parallelism is trivial to add.
- eklavya 4y agoThis is oft overlooked, Haskell is absolutely in a league of its own when it comes to concurrency and parallel capabilities. I would highly recommend https://simonmar.github.io/pages/pcph.html https://simonmar.github.io/pages/pcph.html regardless of which language you use day to day. It a treasure trove of excellent information.