4 ms·
The veracity of his claims hinges on the provenance of this image[0]. This statement doesn't leave much to the imagination: > they had one very tough question
by dleslie 4y ago
The veracity of his claims hinges on the provenance of this image[0]. This statement doesn't leave much to the imagination:
> they had one very tough question about why Alex Berenson hasn't been kicked off from the platform
0: https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F525b334b-1078-4eee-91c0-818092378a29_640x480.jpeg https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_pr...
- mikkergp 4y agoTough questions are the basis for accountability not demands. The media asks tough questions of the government all the time, no one things they are being demanded something of. If you can’t ask tough questions you can’t make progress. Twitter is a multi billion dollar compay with an army of lawyers, if there were no threats or no use of the word “must” or “demand” then there is a lot to interpret. I’m just being literal here. If you want to read between the lines ok, but it’s not what’s written in the image. The idea that this extremist blogger is infallible is equally "as tiresome as reading the twisted logic of sovereign citizens". I'm not saying assume best intent when it comes to the government but assuming worst intent is just as likely to take you away from the truth.
- dleslie 4y agoThe media is not empowered to make demands of the government and expect them to be fulfilled. The government enjoys the imbalance of power. No one has claimed the blogger is infallible; but even the rights of despicable people are worth defending.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]