> Is it? His free speech was not violated. It just wasn’t published by Twitter. The line between free speech (of publishers) and government censorship is somew

> Is it? His free speech was not violated. It just wasn’t published by Twitter. The line between free speech (of publishers) and government censorship is somewhere around "did the government tell the publisher to do it?". This case probably doesn't cross the line, but it's definitely in the grey area, and being in the grey area is bad optics.