> You’re setting up a gigantic straw man. There are camps on HN who dislike all of those things individually—you can’t just take the union of everything someone

> You’re setting up a gigantic straw man. There are camps on HN who dislike all of those things individually—you can’t just take the union of everything someone here dislikes and call it the HN gestalt. Is there a name for that fallacy? I.e., when two different subgroups have incompatible positions, treating each individual in those groups as holding both positions?