4 ms·
An obvious thing to stop doing is participating in the cryptocurrency economy that is using an obscene amount of energy, see https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-en
by hsavit1 4y ago
An obvious thing to stop doing is participating in the cryptocurrency economy that is using an obscene amount of energy, see https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption/ https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption/
- thelastgallon 4y agoBitcoin funded by taxpayer money! Texas paid this company to mine bitcoin during an ongoing energy crisis. Meanwhile, Texans are paying 50% more in electricity costs compared to last year. [1] [1]https://www.pcgamer.com/texas-paid-this-company-to-mine-bitcoin-during-an-ongoing-energy-crisis/ https://www.pcgamer.com/texas-paid-this-company-to-mine-bitc...
- melling 4y agoStrange, for the past 40 years I thought the obvious thing was to stop using coal to generate electricity. 40% of the world’s electricity is generated from coal, and the amount is increasing. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/08/germany-reactivate-coal-power-plants-russia-curbs-gas-flow https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/08/germany-reacti...
- ZeroGravitas 4y agoThe percentage of coal electricity is slightly falling globally. In non-percentage terms it's still rising as electricity demand rises, particularly in China. This (non percentage) rise is forecast to peak around 2028 in China (and therefore the rest of the world) currently.
- eloff 4y agoI think future generations will look back and think we were morons for choosing coal over nuclear. The radiation from particulates released by burning coal actually kills more people each year than the radiation from nuclear accidents has ever killed. Plus we also made a nice little climate change disaster on our little space ship Earth that's hurling through the Milky Way.
- Atheb 4y agoNo need for future generations. Lots of people in this current generation think it's an absolutely poor idea to choose coal over nuclear.
- throwaway33175 4y agoHow moronic would it be, when the actual solution, renewable energy sources, are not even discussed? Choosing nuclear energy bears the same moronic behavior. It's unsustainable and, compared to coal, we have much less options handling it's waste on a much larger time scale. "Not beeing able to handle the waste" is the same problem category and nobody cares. This is not just short-sightedness, it's also a propagandistic master piece. Decades of a lacking energy transition plan and now, when the situation gets more dire, the debate goes between non-solution A and non-solution B. But at least we have status quo going for _us_.
- eloff 4y agoRenewables weren't an option in those days. They've only recently started to become viable, and are not really viable at scale until the energy storage solution can also be solved at a combined cost equivalent to coal or nuclear. I do think it will get there, but it's not fair to look back at the last 70 years and say why didn't we do more renewables.
- YorickPeterse 4y agoThat doesn't mean it's not obvious to stop wasting even more energy on cryptocurrency scams. While it's not going to undo the waste that existed before, it might help to prevent it from getting even worse.