3 ms·
Yeah I was already formulating my rant to complain about web pages that are not able to show what essentially is text and images, without supporting JavaScript.
by j1elo 4y ago
Yeah I was already formulating my rant to complain about web pages that are not able to show what essentially is text and images, without supporting JavaScript...
But now that I saw the site, I can understand that the need is justified, given how the page is built (essentially not a web site, but an application that allows dynamically building a script, by injecting snippets that each do a specific function).
No doubt this could have been done with just text and hyperlinks, but the result would have been a completely different UX.
- philliphaydon 4y agoIt’s not just text and images. It build a script tailored to your desire.
- phist_mcgee 4y agoIsn't that essentially what all web apps do? Dynamically add and remove content from a single page?