3 ms·

I don't have a problem with people using Facebook this way -- that's cool if it fills this function for you! It is unfortunate though that as "a glorified phon

I don't have a problem with people using Facebook this way -- that's cool if it fills this function for you! It is unfortunate though that as "a glorified phone book" Facebook engages in so many practices that are creepy and intrusive. I think that if Facebook did just provide phonebook-like functionality I would be so interested in using it. Instead, it feels more like an application(s) built to serve ads that happens to provide some phonebook functionality. But, ultimately Meta's business model won't change for users like me -- and I don't blame them. And they don't necessarily need to change because although everyone seems to dislike the practices they engage in, nobody really quits Facebook.

fwn 4y ago
IMO there is little value in actually quitting facebook. If you aren't using their apps and block their embeds on third-party sites it just sits there and allows you to be what our parents described as a global phone book. I deleted everything I uploaded, unfollowed everyone, locked it down and made a backup. Most of their indeed very creepy practices are optional. edit: this is also probably a good learning for other services: have a working non obstrusive mode to retain almost-off users.
midoridensha 4y ago
>I think that if Facebook did just provide phonebook-like functionality I would be so interested in using it. Instead, it feels more like an application(s) built to serve ads that happens to provide some phonebook functionality. For me, this is exactly how it works. I never see any ads.