4 ms·
What's hilarious is that this is still up three hours after posting with not even a reply. So much for censorship. You're totally allowed to post that here, e
by ajross 4y ago
What's hilarious is that this is still up three hours after posting with not even a reply. So much for censorship. You're totally allowed to post that here, even while conflating one charity with a continent-wide protest movement, one leader's out of context quote with the goals of that movement, and one enforcement action by Amazon Smile with an accusation of "fraud".
For those interested in whether there's any truth in those links (there is! though maybe not nearly as juicy as promised), Wikipedia has a great overview as always: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter_Global_Network_Foundation#Criticism_and_disputes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter_Global_Netw...
- tacocataco 4y agoMaybe because it's relevant to the discussion in the thread. How many other times do you think it'd be appropriate to bring up the same topic? Probably very few, and it would get deleted if not.
- mulmen 4y agoIt was flagged and dead almost immediately then zmgsabst made another post [1] linking to the dead post and someone vouched for the dead post you see here. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32432791 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32432791
- paganel 4y agoIgnoring or de-facto shadow-banning is also a form of censorship.
- mulmen 4y agoI’ll keep saying it. Nobody has a right to an audience. Ignoring something isn’t censorship.
- procombo 4y agoShouldn't I get to decide what I ignore?
- mulmen 4y agoAgain, ignoring and censoring aren't the same thing. Part of the reason I come to HN is that I know there are entire classes of content and ideas that I will not be exposed to at all so I don't have to waste brain cycles on sorting them. Similarly I use a spam filter on my email.
- procombo 4y agoIf I wanted to provide a similar experience, targeting a different narrative, and then worked to create my own safe platform, would you disagree with that? "Ignoring" is just choice. And that concept can either promote or extinguish fair and free communication. I assume you and I share similar political beliefs. Call it censorship, or call it "choice", it ia clear today not all people have fair and free access. If the government uses its power to extinguish speech (or to burden channels through unfair promotion of counter ideas), then that is censorship. And that is a problem we should all want to fix.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]