4 ms·
Realistically, didn't most of this start when MS paid massive amounts for time exclusive DLC in the 360 era for some of the biggest games like Skyrim[0] or COD
by flutas 4y ago
Realistically, didn't most of this start when MS paid massive amounts for time exclusive DLC in the 360 era for some of the biggest games like Skyrim[0] or COD (5 years in a row)[1], or flat out exclusive content in GTA IV[2]? To me this seems like MS is crying that Sony stole their playbook and is doing it better. Granted either of them doing it is bad for consumers in general.
[0]: https://www.eurogamer.net/skyrim-dlc-timed-xbox-360-exclusive https://www.eurogamer.net/skyrim-dlc-timed-xbox-360-exclusiv...
[1]: https://www.eurogamer.net/after-five-years-of-xbox-exclusivity-call-of-duty-switches-to-playstation https://www.eurogamer.net/after-five-years-of-xbox-exclusivi...
[2]: https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2007/06/gta-iv-downloadable-content-cost-microsoft-50-million-is-360-exclusive/ https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2007/06/gta-iv-downloadable-c...
- girvo 4y agoNo, Sony has always had exclusive agreements with certain studios properties (and then purchased those studios later on) going back to the late 90s, before Microsoft ever entered the console market. This sort of behaviour was well established in the industry.