4 ms·
These are all good & fair points. I think in this case "but trying to prevent the discussion from happening does suggest that you benefit from the status quo."
by jrsj 4y ago
These are all good & fair points. I think in this case "but trying to prevent the discussion from happening does suggest that you benefit from the status quo." would also apply equally to someone trying to silence any dissent or criticism of the ideas they themselves were putting forwards. Either a fair and open discussion needs to happen about these things or they shouldn't be part of a workplace at all. And any standards that are created need to be applied universally too -- you can't just label some as protected groups and tell everyone else to go fuck themselves if they're experiencing a problem, which is basically how things work today.
And that's where my complaint about silencing this topic at Google stems from. If others have been able to do it and get special privileges for themselves than preventing further discussion along these lines only further cements those advantages and the disadvantage of others. It either needs to be eliminated entirely or allowed to continue to evolve.
- fleddr 4y ago"Either a fair and open discussion needs to happen about these things or they shouldn't be part of a workplace at all." Fully agree, where "these things" also include topics the typical activist may not agree with. Personally, I think it's a myth for such truly open truth-seeking debates to be possible at all, at work even less so.