4 ms·
The areas with highest quality of life have declining population, so your premise is flawed. Obviously the solution is to increase our resource usage. If we ha
by tomp 4y ago
The areas with highest quality of life have declining population, so your premise is flawed.
Obviously the solution is to increase our resource usage. If we had abundant clean energy (e.g. nuclear, maybe even wind/solar) none of this would be a problem.
- giantg2 4y ago"The areas with highest quality of life have declining population, so your premise is flawed." Which premise, and how so? "Obviously the solution is to increase our resource usage. If we had abundant clean energy (e.g. nuclear, maybe even wind/solar) none of this would be a problem." I fail to see how this solves all our problems. How does this replace things like metals, plastics, all agricultural products, over fishing, deforestation, etc?