3 ms·
I tend to agree with Randall Munroe on this: > You'll never find a programming language that frees you from the burden of clarifying your ideas. (https://xkcd.
by daniel-thompson 4y ago
I tend to agree with Randall Munroe on this:
> You'll never find a programming language that frees you from the burden of clarifying your ideas. (https://xkcd.com/568/ https://xkcd.com/568/)
- mikkergp 4y agoTotally agreed, really the goal of any programming whatever is to determine how easy is it to model the related logic. Low-code/No-code is not some magic bullet, it's just another way of doing it. The question has always been how well can you abstract certain well known logic. Rails makes it so you don't have to interact with networking primitives... Until you try in a way that doesn't match that. But there are a whole mess of crud apps in the world. The real thing that I think low code will hit up against is scale. Everyone in the world can write twitter in a CS 101 class, but scale means a closer connection between the business logic and the technical implementation and I think you'll run into the 9 foot ladder 10 foot wall problem. Low code/No Code will be increasingly useful at building larger and better apps, but the problem spaces and scale will continue to grow.