> Do you think that just because something is not regularly done, that automatically means it is bad or not feasible? I think it proves that co-ops are just wo

> Do you think that just because something is not regularly done, that automatically means it is bad or not feasible? I think it proves that co-ops are just worse at complex tasks. A company requires just one dedicated and driven individual (the founder), and the rest of people can be hired and just do tasks assigned to them. Whereas, in a coop, the decision-making process is much harder, and just doesn't work as well for complex organizations. And, game devving (like many other complex tasks) is so hard and fraught with perils, that you don't want to throw in additional complications if you don't have to.