4 ms·
A maximalist novel reminds me a bit of brutalist architecture. I'm the right place and time, there could be nothing more impressive and imposing, but you need t
by darkerside 4y ago
A maximalist novel reminds me a bit of brutalist architecture. I'm the right place and time, there could be nothing more impressive and imposing, but you need to be pretty full of yourself to think that is worth putting your reader through something like that.
On that note, the ideas and the payoff had better be worth it. Otherwise, If you don't have the content to warrant it, you're abusing your reader. A maximalist novel is actually laziness in some ways (see the Mark Twain line about writing a long letter).
When I read the quotes from Mount Chicago, I'm rolling my eyes. They come across as trite, reheated leftovers, served in a Michelin star package. Likely these are cherry picked examples, but they are part of the author's published book. He needs to own them.
I will say, the article is worth reading, or at least skimming, for the Seinfeld quote at the end alone. It may have singlehandedly changed my mind about some aspects of modern comedy.
- bambax 4y ago> see the Mark Twain line about writing a long letter Do you mean Pascal? It was Blaise Pascal who wrote, in 1657, that his letter was longer than usual because he lacked the time of making it shorter. After looking up the Quote Investigator [] it seems that sentence from Pascal has a long history of being quoted and appropriated by many authors in English; and in 1975 "an article in the “Chicago Tribune” of Illinois about writing postcards attributed a version of the saying to Twain". But the originator is French philosopher and polymath Blaise Pascal ;-) [0] https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/04/28/shorter-letter/ https://quoteinvestigator.com/2012/04/28/shorter-letter/