4 ms·
> Oh wait, that's the definition of dark matter. No, actually calling it missing mass is dark matter. MOND would be another explanation, and there's no reason
by naasking 4y ago
> Oh wait, that's the definition of dark matter.
No, actually calling it missing mass is dark matter. MOND would be another explanation, and there's no reason to conclude it's unworkable.
- albertopv 4y agoMOND still need dark matter, it seems https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics#Responses_and_criticism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_Newtonian_dynamics#Re...
- naasking 4y agoThat's not what you can infer from the data. Some observations fit well with MOND, some with dark matter. See: From Galactic Bars to the Hubble Tension: Weighing Up the Astrophysical Evidence for Milgromian Gravity, https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/7/1331/htm https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/14/7/1331/htm