3 ms·
Theories, sure, but knowledge is not confined to theories, i.e. isn’t there positive knowledge, a.k.a. “facts”?
by Koshkin 4y ago
Theories, sure, but knowledge is not confined to theories, i.e. isn’t there positive knowledge, a.k.a. “facts”?
- sega_sai 4y agoYes there are facts. I.e. there is a particle called electron, there is a Sun, Cosmic Microwave background, Milky Way galaxy. I'd say those are facts. But I do think the boundary what's a 'fact' vs model/theory dependent statement can be different among different people.
- myrryr 4y agoThere are theories with super high levels of supporting evidence, so we treat them as true. This isn't to say that is a bad thing, it is a great thing.
- kubanczyk 4y agoI treat them as true because they are true. I guess there is more than one definition of truth. But I think what you mean that you treat some theories as axioms (temporarily, I hope). It's a great aid in thinking but a great source of confusion for newbies as well.
- sethrin 4y agoThere are absolutely multiple definitions of truth. "1 + 1 = 2" is not true in the sense that "Paris is the capital of France" or "Water boils at 100C" are true.
- tsimionescu 4y agoOutside of mathematics, not really. Special relativity and QM proved that 300 year old "facts" were actually subtly wrong, for example.