3 ms·
> Assuming FSD is currently as good as a human driver That's a massive assumption made without evidence. > Tesla publishes details about accidents per million
by lern_too_spel 4y ago
> Assuming FSD is currently as good as a human driver
That's a massive assumption made without evidence.
> Tesla publishes details about accidents per million miles driven and compares that with Autopilot active and without.
The problems with Tesla's autopilot (different from FSD) statistics have been pointed out before: https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/06/teslas-using-autopilot-crashed-273-times-in-less-than-a-year/ https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/06/teslas-using-autopilot-...
- pedalpete 4y agoI wasn't aware of the problems with Tesla's statistics before. I find it of an accusation that you say I've a "massive assumption made without evidence". The "evidence" I have is the data from Tesla itself, which states that FSD is better than a person, so I reduced that to say "as good". The "problems with Tesla's data" as pointed out in the ars technica article doesn't make a comparison to an average driver, or give details on the number of miles driven per accident, etc etc So, how are we to know where a regular human driver falls on the spectrum.
- lern_too_spel 4y ago> The "evidence" I have is the data from Tesla itself, which states that FSD is better than a person, so I reduced that to say "as good". What data has Tesla provided about FSD? The only data I'm aware of is about Autopilot, and that data doesn't look very good when correctly interpreted.