3 ms·
> Because then small states would have little reason to remain in the union. Other than, say, the absolutely immense advantage of belonging to the most prosper
by moistly 4y ago
> Because then small states would have little reason to remain in the union.
Other than, say, the absolutely immense advantage of belonging to the most prosperous, most powerful country in the world.
But, yes, undoubtedly thee are quite a few states that are narcissistic enough to think they’re better off going it alone, their tiny population of a few hundred thousand and their easily corruptible political goofs versus the economic, political, and media forces of major world powers.
- pauldenton 4y agoSo why did Roman provinces on the periphery keep rebelling and attempting to leave the most prosperous, most powerful country in the world. Surely Rome would never fall, as nobody would want to leave the most prosperous, most powerful country in the world.
- ethbr0 4y ago> their tiny population of a few hundred thousand California and Texas, the obvious examples, would be the ~37th (around Ukraine and Canada) and ~51st (around Nepal and Venezuela) largest countries by population in the world.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- moistly 4y agoYou’ll note that OP specified small states.