4 ms·
> I question how desirable that even is. I agree, and would go even further - is this even desirable to the creators of the game? Sounds a lot like shooting th
by Mo3 4y ago
> I question how desirable that even is.
I agree, and would go even further - is this even desirable to the creators of the game? Sounds a lot like shooting themselves into the foot. They profit off having closed ecosystems and kids having to buy skins instead of already owning them from somewhere else
- vitaflo 4y agoThis is exactly why game makers will never do this. They make money on churn. Put out a new game, users must buy all new skins. If you allow porting of skins you drastically reduce your profit. It’s just a stupid business decision. Companies like walled gardens for a reason.
- presentation 4y agoWhat if importing skins incurs a fee?
- eli 4y agoWhy not let me just import any random skin for a fee? If I'm making money on the import fees, why would I limit myself to just skins that a user has already previously purchased somewhere else?