3 ms·
Here is another Eric Schmidt quote on radars: Eric Schmidt: However, our report says that it's really important for us to find a way to maintain two generation
by LeonTheremin 4y ago
Here is another Eric Schmidt quote on radars:
Eric Schmidt: However, our report says that it's really important for us to find a way to maintain two generations of semiconductor leadership ahead of China. Now, the history here is important. In the 1980s, we created a group called SEMATECH. We had a bunch of semiconductor manufacturing in America. Eventually that all moved to East Asia, primarily Singapore, and then South Korea and now Taiwan through TSMC. The most important chips are made in Samsung and TSMC, South Korea, and Taiwan. China has had over 30 years to plan to try to catch up. It's really difficult.
Eric Schmidt: We don't want them to catch up. We want to stay ahead. We call for all sorts of techniques to try to make sure that we rebuild a domestic semiconductor and semiconductor manufacturing facility within the United States. This is important, by the way, for our commercial industry as well as for national security for obvious reasons. By the way, chips, I'm not just referring to CPU chips, there's a whole new generation, I'll give you an example, of sensor chips that sense things. It's really important that those be built in America.
https://www.hoover.org/research/pacific-century-eric-schmidt-talks-about-great-sino-us-tech-war-and-how-win-it https://www.hoover.org/research/pacific-century-eric-schmidt...
Sensitive radar sensors plus machine learning may or may not be enough to extract people's inner speech - and would surely be a risk to "national security".
If someone like Schmidt is so afraid of this being available for other countries, it is safer to assume it is feasible and he knows it - given he has also been saying people will be able to clone themselves as virtual assistants that will outlive them.
Albeit, feasible or not, researching and demonstrating it is whole more difficult when a billionaire is "calling on all sorts of techniques" to assure their monopoly.
- pyinstallwoes 4y agoI’m imagining that every single human has a detectable thinking signature at quite the distance and then that is simulated in a virtual world with machine learning predicting every single person on earth in real time, with forward propagation of scenarios.
- picture 4y agoWhere did you get this idea of a "thinking signature" from? What you're saying is just simply not possible. Assuming people are completely deterministic at the nanoscale, you cannot propagate forward even half a second without accounting for the stimulus from the entire world. You also cannot simulate people's minds without knowledge of basically what their every molecule are doing. Machine learning won't help you here very much. EDIT: Looking at your profile after responding to another comment by you, it looks like you believe there exist some sort of vibration that seem to be different from the physics concept? What is the vibration that you understand?
- pyinstallwoes 4y agoIf what you’re saying is true then you couldn’t use any BCI. By vibration I mean signal, which is frequency. Everything exists as vibrations in boundary conditions. Does a simulation of a car need every molecule? Then why would a brain?