Yeah, that's what I was meaning to say. There's a difference between "the schema evolves" and "there is no schema (not even implicitly)". And it can also be "p

Yeah, that's what I was meaning to say. There's a difference between "the schema evolves" and "there is no schema (not even implicitly)". And it can also be "parts of the schema are fixed, others are not". > I think for me the clue was when we introduced Mongoose to ... enforce a schema onto our schema-less Mongo collections and help out with the relational querying. I agree that when you're doing things like that you're not really taking advantage of "schemaless", and that's probably a sign that that's not what you really want.