50 ms·
Because those things don't impose the will of the minority. There are somethings that a better decided by people familiar with the local circumstances. I would
by frankbreetz 4y ago
Because those things don't impose the will of the minority. There are somethings that a better decided by people familiar with the local circumstances.
I would argue a person in Wyoming's vote being worth 65x that of person's in California has no benefit.
- pauldenton 4y agoBut that would be in the senate, where each state has 2 representatives. Legislation is started in the House typically, where the number of representatives scales with population.
- Ekaros 4y agoWhy should some imaginary line decide who gets to vote? Isn't it wrong that people on other side of state decide what happens at the other border. Wouldn't it be better to allow also the people on the other side of the border have fair vote on things.