3 ms·
There are differences though. Anyone can take the Chromium web engine and build their own browser on top, with tremendous amounts of control. Heck, this is suc
by asdajksah2123 4y ago
There are differences though. Anyone can take the Chromium web engine and build their own browser on top, with tremendous amounts of control. Heck, this is such an attractive proposition that even Microsoft has done this.
While the mono culture of a Chromium driven web is a huge problem, it's not the same as the IE problem.
The biggest mistake IMO was the Firefox open source project focusing on building a browser as opposed to a web engine.
Even nodejs was created on Chromium (and the difficulty of building node on Gecko was the primary reason why MS chose Chromium over Gecko).
I suspect if we want to avoid a Chromium monoculture, we will need a similar split like the Netscape > Firefox one, where someone pulls out the Gecko rendering engine and builds an open source product/business on top of it.
- dmitriid 4y ago> Anyone can take the Chromium web engine and build their own browser on top, with tremendous amounts of control. No. There's no "tremendous amount of control". You're still ~100% reliant on Chrome to produce all the features. > where someone pulls out the Gecko rendering engine and builds an open source product/business on top of it. What would be that business? Browsers are free. On top of that: you've ripped out the rendering engine. Now what? You still have to update it, and develop it, and keep up with the rest of the industry.