4 ms·
The steps outlined don't go far enough in my opinion. They stop at 'deliver' as if that was the goal. I've had several roles that involved a lot of presentatio
by uncertainrhymes 4y ago
The steps outlined don't go far enough in my opinion. They stop at 'deliver' as if that was the goal.
I've had several roles that involved a lot of presentations and public speaking. I've also been subjected to hundreds of terrible talks.
I think I'm reasonably good at it, and my best advice is to start from a place of "think of the audience first".
Clarity of the message isn't just an ordering of facts, but people's brains expect a story. I don't mean padding, or a made up narrative with characters. You need to set the stage, deliver your message in a way that engages, and you must have something compelling.
But if you can put yourself in their shoes during the preparation and presentation you will find it easier to chop out unnecessary content, change the dynamics, and engage.
You are there for them; they may or may not be there for you.
This is a tangent, but ... tangents are your enemy. The people I struggle the most to understand never complete a thought they started. That clarity of thought and speech comes from knowing the objective of the next sentence you say, even if you don't know what words you are going use just yet. If even you don't know the point, no one else will either.
- superchroma 4y agoYep, this, tell them what they actually want to hear. Make it interesting, keep it light. Pick the right detail level for the audience. Tune the content for the things the audience cares about. I often see people diving into the deep end at work, bringing up console outputs and spreadsheets when presenting. It's like we've completely forgotten everything we hated about lectures in in university.
- atoav 4y agoTo those people I tend to recommend to draw their talk as a flow chart of thoughts which depend on each other. If one thing leads to another draw an arrow. If it does not, don't. If there is a tangent mark it as a tangent (going 90 degrees to the side). You can do this with your own talks, or talks you really liked or disliked. You'd be surprised of the structural differences