This clarification is either very poorly written, or very duplicitous. They say what court documents in part indicate, but give no clarity on whether that porti

This clarification is either very poorly written, or very duplicitous. They say what court documents in part indicate, but give no clarity on whether that portion of the court documents were, or were not, part of what was under the secrecy order, nor do they reveal whether or not they had access to those portions of the documents at the time. The entire statement seems designed to confuse the issue. Laying that aside, are they saying that they will not turn over user data when they know the request for data relates to a person being prosecuted for seeking or helping with an abortion? I don’t think they are saying that, but they are trying to get good will as if they would fight such a request, even though they wouldn’t.