>> You can't be stupider than a rock, but there seems to be no upper definite upper limit to human intelligence. But to conclude from this that most are below

>> You can't be stupider than a rock, but there seems to be no upper definite upper limit to human intelligence. But to conclude from this that most are below average, wouldn't you have to know that the high IQs pull the average up more than the low IQs pull it down? I don't see how the mere assumption that there's no upper limit gets you there (not to mention that this assumption is bound to be wrong anyway). But as you say, maybe there's a reason I'm in the big half...