You are conflating the judicial system with enforcement authorities. Judges very often do reject charges and procedures brought to them by the enforcement auth

You are conflating the judicial system with enforcement authorities. Judges very often do reject charges and procedures brought to them by the enforcement authorities. This separation of power is evident if you ever sit in on proceedings (many courts allow and encourage the public to sit and watch). Enforcement authority is executive branch and answerable to the elected officials. If you don't like asset forfeiture - ask the mayor why he allows it. You may discover that your fellow residents don't agree with you. Judicial review panels are what judges endure in their tenure where panels of judges review how frequently their rulings are overturned in appeal. The rationale of their rulings are disputed and their tenure as a judge can be removed if they're found to intentionally skirt the law by their peers. This is how the system works. Do you have specific suggestions to make it better, or are you just advocating we burn everything down?