3 ms·
I liked to imagine astronauts as individuals who excelled so much in their given fields that they stood out and were actively recruited by NASA. Instead, I fin
by courtewing 15y ago
I liked to imagine astronauts as individuals who excelled so much in their given fields that they stood out and were actively recruited by NASA. Instead, I find out that NASA posts job postings and interviews people just like everyone else. This would be mildly concerning other than the fact that it appears to be working.
Edit: I wonder if they are asked silly interview questions such as "If you were stuck on the moon with only three items, what would you want them to be and why?"
- bfe 15y agoOne question they apparently do ask of every candidate is, "What can you do better than anyone else in the world." I think being able to have an answer for that is a worthy goal.
- hugh3 15y agoI liked to imagine astronauts as individuals who excelled so much in their given fields that they stood out and were actively recruited by NASA. Instead, I find out that NASA posts job postings and interviews people just like everyone else Possibly if your job is "test pilot" then you might still get recruited by NASA. For scientist-astronauts, though, I'm guessing that being spectacularly brilliant in your particular field is neither sufficient nor necessary to be a good astronaut; better to hire good but not necessarily field-leading science-trained types who also excel in the various other qualities which you need in order to strap yourself to a giant bomb and perform brilliantly in adverse circumstances for several days without enough sleep.