I mean, you're making the same three claims as if they're magic gotchas but you don't understand what you're saying. 1) Care at tavistock is bad Yes, everyone

I mean, you're making the same three claims as if they're magic gotchas but you don't understand what you're saying. 1) Care at tavistock is bad Yes, everyone agrees, that's why people are pleased that Cass recommends the NHS continues its long established plan to remove care from Tavi. 2) There's no evidence There's plenty of evidence. It doesn't come from tavi, but that's because they provide so little care it's not possible to use their patients as experimental subjects. We have lots of evidence from other countries and other patient cohorts 3) Cass says... Mostly you're misunderstanding what Cass says, or you're relying on the single source that agrees with you and ignoring international scientific and medical opinion. 4) The new centres are providing less gender affirming care than tavi The vast majority of children attending tavi got no care at all because they were on a waiting list and then aged out of children's services. But even if they got treatment at tavi the vast majority got no meds at all but psycho-social advice. The new centres will be doing this too, but with more children and with smaller waiting lists and the shared care agreements with GPs will be clearer.