3 ms·
Why not just use DynamoDB at that point, would likely be cheaper.
by wizwit999 4y ago
Why not just use DynamoDB at that point, would likely be cheaper.
- senttoschool 4y agoYea I agree. Seems like it should have been a NoSQL solution from that start. Even today, it should be pretty straightforward to port the data over to a NoSQL db.
- manfre 4y agoDynamodb can be very painful with certain usage patterns or if you need to change/add usage patterns. For startups or MVP apps/features, it's a lot easier and cheaper to adhoc SQL.