4 ms·
> A counter argument could be that it is unfair for the rich to be exposed to such increased scrutiny merely because of their money I think it is very fine to
by igorkraw 4y ago
> A counter argument could be that it is unfair for the rich to be exposed to such increased scrutiny merely because of their money
I think it is very fine to discriminate against people based in things that give them enormous power, quality if life and they can easily get rid of. Unlike being discriminated and scrutinized for having no money , you can easily escape scrutiny due to wealth by giving away wealth with no meaningful reduction of quality of life (after a given point)
- terryf 4y agoReally? You think there is an ending to a sentence that starts with: "I think it is very fine to discriminate against people based in.." That's actually good?
- igorkraw 4y agoYes. "It is very fine to discriminate against people based on them behaving like assholes" is another one. If you can't point to the injustice in the discrimination and are reduced to claiming all discrimination is bad you have run out of arguments
- sgt101 4y agoIt's really not because of their money, it's because of how they got their money and what they are doing with it and the great harms that accrue to everyone else due to those processes.
- Fnoord 4y agoTrue, after a certain amount one has enough money, and the next goal becomes power. One person's power is directly opposed to the power of the rest. And more often than not, untraceable money is a tool to achieve more (unwarranted) power.