23 ms·
> one has clear benefits for large numbers of people and the other very much does not. Why does it benefit large numbers of others to have denser housing right
by bluefirebrand 4y ago
> one has clear benefits for large numbers of people and the other very much does not.
Why does it benefit large numbers of others to have denser housing right here where my house is though?
There is plenty of room in the world to build denser housing for them elsewhere, while I can still have what I want. Win-Win
> the fact that people are upset with those who are doing a thing that is inherently self-serving at the expense of others doesn't seems reasonable.
What expense of others? Go live somewhere else. There are plenty of dense housing options that aren't here where my house is.
- awillen 4y ago> Why does it benefit large numbers of others to have denser housing right here where my house is though? It benefits large numbers of others to have denser housing in any highly populated area, particularly those that are desirable. If your house is in an area that can be described that way, then that's the reason it benefits large numbers of others to build denser housing right where your house is. The problem is, obviously, when everyone adopts the same attitude you have. Then there's no "somewhere else" to build. And hey, just like you're absolutely allowed to try to get the government to keep your area zoned as it is, others can try to get the government to loosen zoning. You don't have to like it, but they're doing the exact same thing you are - using the same processes to achieve something that's favorable to them.