That is, again, not what was argued. Your comment claimed all travel is ‘pointless’ and without any reasonable justification. It was filled with invective for

That is, again, not what was argued. Your comment claimed all travel is ‘pointless’ and without any reasonable justification. It was filled with invective for anyone who might have chosen to travel at some point. It was an argument lacking in perspective or empathy. You’re now trying to turn this into a question of whether these might be justifiable sacrifices but that was never a point of contention. In fact, it’s something I raised first. As I said, not a good faith response.