3 ms·

That is not a normal statement if it is your company's fault the question even came up. "We left a giant tub filled with cyanide completely unsupervised in fro

That is not a normal statement if it is your company's fault the question even came up. "We left a giant tub filled with cyanide completely unsupervised in front of our door for months. We have no evidence that it was used to murder someone." Has an entirely different sound to it, no?

pcthrowaway 4y ago
More like the tub was filled with water and "we have no evidence it was used to drown someone (but also we didn't check for floating bodies)"
- lostcolony 4y ago
  "We left our gun outside, unsecured, but no one has complained they were shot with it and we didn't detect any fingerprints on it when we finally noticed it wasn't locked up properly"
  - themitigating 4y ago
    Now you're claiming they didn't investigate properly which a completely different situation that you also don't have evidence for.
- rrix2 4y ago
  or: "keeping fine grained indexed API logs around for months on end is too expensive so we threw out the body with the bathwater"
themitigating 4y ago
How does it have a different sound? "We left a giant tub filled with cyanide completely unsupervised in front of our door for months. We have no evidence that it was used to murder someone." No one would say that second sentence, if you don't have evidence of something you don't state that because of the set of objects and events that didn't happen is infinite. "We left a giant tub filled with cyanide completely unsupervised in front of our door for months. We have no evidence that someone accidentally fell into it, an animal died in it, it was used in a bank robbery, someone's cell phone slipped it in............" "That person owns a gun legally, we have no evidence that he used it to murder someone" Why not "
- diffeomorphism 4y ago
  What was your train of thought from "we made a giant mistake. We have no evidence of consequences, yet." to "that person owns a gun legally"?

pcthrowaway 4y ago

More like the tub was filled with water and "we have no evidence it was used to drown someone (but also we didn't check for floating bodies)"

lostcolony 4y ago
"We left our gun outside, unsecured, but no one has complained they were shot with it and we didn't detect any fingerprints on it when we finally noticed it wasn't locked up properly"
- themitigating 4y ago
  Now you're claiming they didn't investigate properly which a completely different situation that you also don't have evidence for.
rrix2 4y ago
or: "keeping fine grained indexed API logs around for months on end is too expensive so we threw out the body with the bathwater"

themitigating 4y ago

How does it have a different sound? "We left a giant tub filled with cyanide completely unsupervised in front of our door for months. We have no evidence that it was used to murder someone." No one would say that second sentence, if you don't have evidence of something you don't state that because of the set of objects and events that didn't happen is infinite. "We left a giant tub filled with cyanide completely unsupervised in front of our door for months. We have no evidence that someone accidentally fell into it, an animal died in it, it was used in a bank robbery, someone's cell phone slipped it in............" "That person owns a gun legally, we have no evidence that he used it to murder someone" Why not "

diffeomorphism 4y ago
What was your train of thought from "we made a giant mistake. We have no evidence of consequences, yet." to "that person owns a gun legally"?