4 ms·
I have to believe that Intel's GPU division will be fine just because I refuse to believe that any executive over at Intel is short sighted enough to believe th
by PaulsWallet 4y ago
I have to believe that Intel's GPU division will be fine just because I refuse to believe that any executive over at Intel is short sighted enough to believe that Intel was going to leap frog AMD and Nvidia or even make a profit within the next 3-5 years. It took AMD years to get it right with Ryzen and AMD still hasn't had a "Ryzen moment" with their GPU. The fact that Intel's GPU can even compete with AMD and Nvidia is a feat of engineering magic. Intel should just take the L and make it a loss leader and grind it out for the long haul.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Miraste 4y agoI would say RDNA/RDNA2 has delivered Ryzen-level improvements. It didn't result in Ryzen-level fanfare because Nvidia improves their GPUs every product cycle instead of sitting still like Intel was doing with processors. I don't think Intel has the leadership or, after their Boeingization (getting rid of senior engineers) the engineering ability to compete with Nvidia.
- eek2121 4y agoAMD has beat NVIDIA in terms of performance and/or perf/watt more than NVIDIA has beaten AMD. Just because NVIDIA has larger market share does not mean they were/are winning. If you need to go back and look at history, look at history. The majority of the time AMD beat the snot out of NVIDIA. The lead only stopped because of a certain prior CEO doing some really dumb stuff. The GPUs you see today (6900xt/6950xt) are the first of a generation of recovery. They are the 'Ryzen 1xxx' equivalents. Note I'm not an AMD fanboy, but I've 3D in my lifetime was popularized by 3DFX, so I remember the entire saga.
- HelloNurse 4y agoBefore delivering good products that customers buy, they need decent products that customers take seriously. Current ARC graphics cards are, reportedly, not even taken seriously by their manufacturers.