3 ms·
> Geekbench is far more representative of what kind of performance you can expect from a CPU. Geekbench is an even worse benchmark than cinebench. It's extreme
by kllrnohj 4y ago
> Geekbench is far more representative of what kind of performance you can expect from a CPU.
Geekbench is an even worse benchmark than cinebench. It's extremely heavily influenced by the underlying OS rather than the hardware being compared.
Cinebench 1T and mT at least actually benchmark the hardware.
- sgerenser 4y agoBenchmark the hardware doing 3D rendering. Which is a pretty niche use case for most people that doesn’t correlate well with more common cpu-intensive tasks like gaming or video editing.
- kllrnohj 4y agoVideo editing is just as niche as 3d rendering. But really neither are actually that niche, see for example https://www.blender.org/news/blender-by-the-numbers-2020/ https://www.blender.org/news/blender-by-the-numbers-2020/ And to put those blender numbers in comparison https://prodesigntools.com/number-of-creative-cloud-subscribers.html https://prodesigntools.com/number-of-creative-cloud-subscrib...
- saagarjha 4y ago> It's extremely heavily influenced by the underlying OS rather than the hardware being compared. How so?