3 ms·
Regardless of who is doing the job, you're still going to need some device on your person (or otherwise readily accessible) that can be used to confirm that you
by jjk166 4y ago
Regardless of who is doing the job, you're still going to need some device on your person (or otherwise readily accessible) that can be used to confirm that you are actually you, and whatever that device is will become a single point of failure.
The real issue is there needs to be some simple standard workflow for when the device (be it smartphone or otherwise) fails. And in this case the government pretty much already is providing that service, or at least the backbone for it. "You lost your phone? Well send us a picture of your driver's license or passport plus a selfie in [this] pose from a different trusted number and, after we try calling your old number just to make sure it's really lost, we'll use the new number." Financial institutions already have the infrastructure for photo-id confirmation for KYC regulations, and selfie verification is widely used for dating apps. Yeah if someone breaks your phone, steals your id, and can deepfake you then they can probably steal your identity, but someone in that position can probably already steal your identity.
- pessimizer 4y ago> you're still going to need some device on your person (or otherwise readily accessible) that can be used to confirm that you are actually you Nah, we don't need that. We've been doing without that for thousands of years.
- wmeredith 4y agoWe also did without anesthesia for thousands of years. This is not a great argument against something.
- jjk166 4y agoWell there's this new thing called the computer which offers both exciting new opportunities like online banking but also new challenges like password cracking which mean we can no longer rely on old methods of identity verification like pulling swords from stones.