5 ms·
Josh, What you're missing is that California went after my company for attempting to do business outside of California, which gives my company standing to oppo
by thinkcomp 15y ago
Josh,
What you're missing is that California went after my company for attempting to do business outside of California, which gives my company standing to oppose the law on interstate commerce grounds.
Aaron
- ceejayoz 15y agoWhat I'm missing is where they "went after [your] company". Did FaceCash get a cease-and-desist that isn't documented in your HN submissions about the issue?
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- strickjb9 15y agoYou don't need to issue a cease-and-desist to choke the life out of a company through clouded regulation such is the case w/ FaceCash. Aaron is obviously going to operate his company within the confines of California law and wasn't able to do so... I'll be following the civil suit very closely. Best of luck.
- ceejayoz 15y agoMy point is that "went after my company" implies that they targeted him specifically, which doesn't seem to be supported by the facts at all. It's like saying "the government is after me!" because of the Census.
- thinkcomp 15y agoIt's documented in the complaint filed with the Court.