3 ms·
Another rehash of the same thing we’ve been hearing for the last thirty years. There’s nothing new in the article, and I’m surprised that Quanta published it.
by wrycoder 4y ago
Another rehash of the same thing we’ve been hearing for the last thirty years. There’s nothing new in the article, and I’m surprised that Quanta published it.
- layer8 4y agoGotta make something out of nothing.
- SkyMarshal 4y agoThis is so meta.
- 52-6F-62 4y agoEven Balder gets an itchy navel.
- As_You_Wish 4y agoYou know, there's always someone that hasn't heard of it before. I'm included in that set of people, so the article is very interesting to me. Just an FYI.
- wrycoder 4y agoSure, but there are many lower level popular science magazines, to say nothing of the hundreds of books that have been published on the topic. Quanta Magazine is a rarity - a non-mathematical magazine that covers the forefront of science in depth. I’d be sad if its editors felt it had to spend its precious pages rehashing what is widely known.