This is certainly the rationale for forbidden discussion of the topic. However, the first amendment is not to be tossed aside when inconvenient. The act itsel

This is certainly the rationale for forbidden discussion of the topic. However, the first amendment is not to be tossed aside when inconvenient. The act itself is not preventable without invading the sanctity of the jury room. The scenario you present shows no relation to the concept of jury nullification presented here; unjust laws versus yours; untouchable persons. One is a protest of society, the other a protection of a group.