4 ms·
Under current case law in the US, my understanding is that public ("operational realities" and reasonable suspicion tests) and private employers (fewer tests) h
by ethbr0 4y ago
Under current case law in the US, my understanding is that public ("operational realities" and reasonable suspicion tests) and private employers (fewer tests) have rights to audit any information on employer-compensated devices they wish (and have access to).
I only use a work phone for work business. If my work requires me to use a phone, I require a work phone.
Carrying two phones is a small price to pay to avoid worrying about an overzealous employer's IT staff.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ontario_v._Quon https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ontario_v._Quon
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Connor_v._Ortega https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Connor_v._Ortega
- Spooky23 4y ago150% agree. That’s a whole other can of worms. Even if the business doesn’t want to audit your phones, a litigation event could force the issue.