3 ms·
It's not decentralized in any practical manner when everyone's local clone is pointing to the same, now no longer available, origin. This could have been mitig
by krono 4y ago
It's not decentralized in any practical manner when everyone's local clone is pointing to the same, now no longer available, origin.
This could have been mitigated by having a pre-determined fallback origin (which could very well be something they had in place - I'm not familiar with this project).
- catlifeonmars 4y ago> It's not decentralized in any practical manner when everyone's local clone is pointing to the same, now no longer available, origin. On the contrary, removing the common, centralized origin makes the project decentralized by definition.
- krono 4y agoSome form of distributed authority could have been implemented as a more practical alternative to the scattered remnants that they might be left with now. You're right, of course. My previous post was written up a bit too hasty :)
- prmoustache 4y agohttps://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email https://git-scm.com/docs/git-send-email