> Nowadays that compatibility is up to C11 subset. Not true unfortunately, the "C subset" is still stuck at something that can at best be called a fork of "C95

> Nowadays that compatibility is up to C11 subset. Not true unfortunately, the "C subset" is still stuck at something that can at best be called a fork of "C95" which was then developed into a "bastard language" that resembled C on the surface, but isn't actually C (e.g. the incomplete designated init support in C++20 is the best example of this half-assed "looks like C, but isn't actually C" philosophy).