3 ms·
Linus said he put them in touch and they haven't even spoken to each other. It's going to take time, but they aren't even engaging at the moment...
by philliphaydon 4y ago
Linus said he put them in touch and they haven't even spoken to each other. It's going to take time, but they aren't even engaging at the moment...
- gkkirilov 4y agosmall companies have less resources?
- philliphaydon 4y agoWhich is why it will take time… but they are not even entertaining the idea.
- qzw 4y agoI would love to see them add an AMD (and even ARM) option, but right now I applaud them for being tight-lipped about any future developments. What would they gain by acknowledging that they’re entertaining such ideas? People postponing their purchases, endlessly asking for ETA updates, getting mad when there are delays, etc. They’re much better off saying nothing and doing the work in the background. I also would understand if they choose not to offer a second CPU platform at this point. From their standpoint, it’s hugely expensive and time consuming to develop, potentially doubles their QA and support costs, makes their supply chain and inventory story more complicated, and probably makes their relationship with Intel a little worse. And realistically, they won’t get double the sales from just having an AMD option. So I would be pleasantly surprised if they offer an AMD option within 3 years, but I’m not holding my breath.
- icegreentea2 4y agoNo, Linus said he put them in touch, and then Linus didn't hear anything.
- philliphaydon 4y agoYou're right, just looked up the transcript. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYc922ntnKM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SYc922ntnKM > source community an amd variant might be > a way around this but in spite of me > making introductions nearly a year ago i > haven't received any update from either > side so consider this a public call out