4 ms·
"Open-source" but no license? Maybe I'm just missing it (on mobile). Nice renders though.
by mkl 4y ago
"Open-source" but no license? Maybe I'm just missing it (on mobile).
Nice renders though.
- 9dev 4y agoNope, there is none. Not even mentioned on the Readme. Somehow people tend to forget the licensing aspect of Open Source, it’s not just putting your code on display
- arlcode 4y agoIn this case you are technically not even allowed to check it out in most jurisdiction. No license means no rights.
- dark-star 4y agoIf, by "most jurisdictions", you mean the US and maybe Canada/Australia... Because in "most jurisdictions" it's not actually illegal to look at things that have no license
- AndrewDucker 4y ago"Checking out" something means making a copy of it, not just looking at it.
- zokier 4y agoGithub ToS grants some permissions
- dagw 4y agoFrom the Github docs: "If you publish your source code in a public repository on GitHub, according to the Terms of Service, other users of GitHub.com have the right to view and fork your repository." So by using GitHub, he has implicitly 'signed over' some rights to other GitHub users.
- actionfromafar 4y agoBut probably not redistribute.
- codetrotter 4y agohttps://github.com/ange-yaghi/manta-ray/issues/221 https://github.com/ange-yaghi/manta-ray/issues/221 Someone opened an issue about this and the creator responded saying that they’ll add a license.