> I wouldn't expect that the internal configuration files of an application should occur in reasonable operation, and therefore it makes sense to panic if they'

> I wouldn't expect that the internal configuration files of an application should occur in reasonable operation, and therefore it makes sense to panic if they're corrupted. Whether an error returned from a fn is expected or unexpected has to be a property of the fn signature and language conventions in isolation. If semantic or other locally-unknowable details influence fault classification and error control flow at call sites, your program program becomes unmaintainable over time. So like if you have fn parse_config that takes a string, or a file descriptor, or whatever -- it should return a Result<Config, Error> and yield an error for any un-parseable input. There is no reason this fn should ever panic. IMO -- call stacks are sacrosanct, making control flow visible and obvious is one of if not the most important thing to optimize in nontrivial programming contexts.