> I honestly would love to see more court precedence set on some of these so-called "structuring" laws where somebody intentionally "structure" or "laundered" m

> I honestly would love to see more court precedence set on some of these so-called "structuring" laws where somebody intentionally "structure" or "laundered" money for the honest-to-goodness sake of legitimate privacy There's lots of court precedent for this. Courts have overwhelmingly found that the goverment's desire to access transactional data for tax compliance outweighs any right to privacy. Courts generally find that just because there might be legitimate reasons to do something with money that doesn't override the requirement to keep records for for tax purposes.