3 ms·
You could have said the same thing about Craigslist. Sometimes it's more important to be disruptive.
by derwiki 15y ago
You could have said the same thing about Craigslist. Sometimes it's more important to be disruptive.
- powertower 15y agoConsumers arn't getting rid of their credit cards any time soon. Why would they? They get 1) credit, 2) get to dispute anything they want off the bill, 3) don't pay any type of fee. And the merchants don't drive payment options ... they simply accept what consumers provide. Also, IMO, the moment fraudsters target Dwolla, is the moment Dwolla realizes that a 2-7% transaction fee is necessary to stay in business.
- dethink 15y agoConsumers pay the fees. Just not directly.
- icebraining 15y agoCostumers don't pay fees for having a CC. They pay fees because CCs exist, regardless of whether they have one or not. Which means using Dwolla or a CC is irrelevant in that regard.
- breck 15y agoMany PoS merchants also now charge surcharges for using cards. (which I admit for a merchant only makes financial sense if you underreport cash on your taxes--otherwise it seems the costs of handling cash coupled with lack of reporting is drastically more than the interchange).
- teej 15y agoCraigslist was profitable from the start. Dwolla is nowhere close. Being disruptive doesn't matter if you can't stay in business.